Phase 2 and 3: Patients with active TED were studied in 24-week, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trials.2,6
Phase 4 study (N=62)1
In 6 patients who were assessed, decrease in orbital fat/muscle volume was observed1
In observation of 6 TEPEZZA patients who had an orbital MRI (12 eyes total), a decrease in orbital fat and muscle volume was shown. Analysis is exploratory and has not been adjusted for multiple comparisons. No conclusions of statistical or clinical significance can be drawn.
Phase 4: Patients with chronic TED studied in a 24-week, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial.1
TEPEZZA Placebo
Changes in GO-QOL vs placebo6,†
GO-QOL (Graves’ ophthalmopathy quality of life patient-reported questionnaire) is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire divided into 2 subscales that is used to measure changes over time in visual functioning and appearance. Equal weight is assigned to 8 measures of visual functioning and appearance, respectively, however their relative importance is unknown. The GO-QOL is not validated in patients with TED. As such, results should be interpreted with caution.2
TEPEZZA Placebo
“Without TEPEZZA, I don’t think that I would have been able to go back to work. When working on a computer all day, the double vision would have made it impossible.”
—Bonnie S., real TEPEZZA patient
Results sustained nearly 2 years after treatment11
Follow-up analyses of outcomes in Phase 2, Phase 3 (OPTIC study), and OPTIC Extension (OPTIC-X) (N=112)11
~2 years after treatment
of TEPEZZA patients did not report additional treatment for TED, including surgery11
Proptosis responders who flared and received an additional course were excluded from the additional treatment count if they were still ≥2 mm proptosis improvement from baseline (n=6).11
~1 year after treatment‡
Responses sustained across key endpoints
(n=38/56)
Proptosis
response
CI [0.54, 0.80]11
(n=35/48)
Diplopia
response
CI [0.58, 0.85]11
(n=52/57)
Improvement of ≥2
points in CAS score CI
CI [0.81, 0.97]11
Kahaly 2024: 112 patients who received 7 or 8 infusions of TEPEZZA in the Phase 2, Phase 3 (OPTIC study), and OPTIC Extension (OPTIC-X) studies were analyzed for long-term maintenance of responses. Responses were assessed and pooled from study baseline to Week 24 (formal study) and up to Week 72 (formal follow-up).§ Outcomes included the percentages of observed patient responses from the study baseline. Studies differed in the timing of follow-up visits, and data from some visits were unavailable.11
‡Consider open-label treatment phase study limitations when interpreting results. The OPTIC-X study was not blinded, not controlled, and included inherent self-selection bias for remaining in the trial.11
§Responses assessed included clinical activity score (CAS ≥2-point improvement), the European Group of Graves’ Orbitopathy ophthalmic composite outcome, diplopia (≥1 Gorman grade improvement), proptosis (≥2-mm improvement), Overall (improvement in proptosis and CAS), and disease inactivation (CAS ≤1).11
CAS, Clinical Activity Score; TED, Thyroid Eye Disease.
“My symptoms haven’t returned since I finished treatment. I feel in control again.”
—Paris M., real TEPEZZA patient